House Ways and Means Committee chairman Charles Rangel has reintroduced the threat of increased taxation on carried interest, a measure he has pushed for for more than two years.
The congressman has introduced legislation that would characterise carried interest income as ordinary income rather than capital gains, effectively raising the tax rate to as high as 39.6 percent. Captial gains are taxed at 15 percent.
The bill is consistent with a proposal in President Obama’s fiscal 2010 budget, which projects such a change would raise $24.616 billion over 10 years. The budget also contains a suggestion to raise the tax rate for the top bracket of ordinary income from 35 percent to 39.6 percent.
The congressman has introduced legislation that would characterise carried interest income as ordinary income rather than capital gains, effectively raising the tax rate to as high as 39.6 percent. Captial gains are taxed at 15 percent.
The bill is consistent with a proposal in President Obama’s fiscal 2010 budget, which projects such a change would raise $24.616 billion over 10 years. The budget also contains a suggestion to raise the tax rate for the top bracket of ordinary income from 35 percent to 39.6 percent.
![]() ![]() |
Charles Rangel |
The proposal includes an exception for managers’ contributions to a fund that don't include a loan made to a partner, directly or indirectly, by another partner or by the partnership. But capital contributions made under management fee waiver programmes, or “management profits interests”, would be caught up in the carried interest net.
“The bill would require such managers to treat carried interest as ordinary income received in exchange for the performance of services, to the extent that carried interest does not reflect a reasonable return on invested capital. The bill would continue to tax carried interest at capital gains tax rates to the extent that carried interest reflects a reasonable return on invested capital,” the bill says.
Any gains or losses on the disposition of an investment services partnership interest would be taxed as ordinary income as well.
In the past two years, the House has passed similar legislation twice before: first as part of HR 3996, where it passed by a vote of 216 to 193, and second as part of HR 6275, where it passed by a vote of 233 to 189, with 10 Republicans joining with 223 Democrats in support. In both instances the respective bills failed to get past the Senate.